> Ken Hanly wronte some stuff in reply to what Carrol Cox I wrote:
> >> Others can carry on the argument about Ehrenreich. I'm not concerned
> >> right now.
> ayah. yup.
> Carrol Cox II wrote:
> Please read the entire subject line. It tells a tale. We (marxism, lbo,
> pen-l, and L-I) simply cannot keep a thread on women going.
> Humanitarian Imperialism is a vital subject, and I've had much to
> say about it in the past and will in the future. But I think the quick
> mutarion into something else of threads on women is a pretty
> good synecdoche for the status on the left (in practice
> and theory) of the "woman question."
> tippy tap
> i've got a can of shit
> can you open it?
> i always make my bed
> please pick on her instead
> i left it all behind
> now you own what's mine
> that's something that i lack
> i want it back
> hands up
> lay down
> don't cry
> stick a needle in your eye
> imperial teen, seasick