OK, I've stated my view. People who want to read B and discuss him can do so, but I won't participate. I thinki he's a waste of time,
--jks
In a message dated Fri, 31 Mar 2000 8:25:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, bhandari at Princeton.EDU (Rakesh Bhandari) writes:
<< Justin, doesn't Rom Harre take Bhaskar quite seriously? Haven't read much Bhaskar at all. Just going by his intro to the philosophy of science, Harre is obviously a very serious and accomplished thinker--so his opinion, if indeed favorable of Bhaskar, should count. And there's that excellent book on Method in the Social Science by Andrew Sayer who is influenced by Bhaskar. Peter Manicas' imposingly erudite History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences is also influenced by Bhaskar. Yours, Rakesh
>>