Fw: An Article From Slate

Max Sawicky sawicky at epinet.org
Fri Mar 31 12:34:37 PST 2000

> [mbs] No, just the opposite. Take-up rates are over 85 percent,
> the highest of any means-tested program.

Max, please clarify. Does this mean that 85% of people for whom employers have filed the necessary papers do in fact "take up" the EITC? But then for what percentage of eligible workers are papers not filed? Don't know what you mean by take up. Thanks, R

It means given their income and family circumstances, 85% or so of those eligible are in the program. Take up means program participation.

Of those in the program, about one percent get benefits through their employer. Almost all get benefits by applying when they file their Federal income tax, with no involvement of the employer.

Often low-wage workers have irregular work schedules, hold multiple jobs over the course of a year, and have changed family circumstances over the course of a year. All these can change their benefits. It can be seen that for an employer or employee, on an hourly basis, determining the exact amount of subsidy is not easy. (Imagine arranging your withholding so that your income tax bill in April was always exactly zero.) This may be a blessing in disguise because it reduces the likelihood that employers can substitute the credit for wages. One suspects workers would just as soon not involve their employer in their EITC application for just this reason. There is also survey evidence that workers like getting the big check, just as taxpayers like getting a refund check rather than optimizing their withholding.

My paper on this with Bob Cherry will be out April 15.


More information about the lbo-talk mailing list