They
> don't include in the category "workers" the billions
> in the Third World who maybe absolutely worse off
> under capitalism than they were under their
> traditional economies.
How? I mean, I'm willing to be proved wrong on this, but It seems to me that, bad as conditions are in the third world today, they are somewhat better than they were before - or is subsistance agriculture, endemic disease, and locally-based despotism superior to a first world capitalist making a buck?
Jim Baird
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/