The China Deal: If You Can't Sell It, Buy It

Tom Lehman TLehman at lor.net
Sun May 21 18:53:39 PDT 2000


That's a rough guage of productivity in the manufacturing sector in terms of dollars and cents. What's the game---lower productivity? Has the manufacturing sector productivity been max'd out? Is that the worry. Not happy with the profits or prospects here, move to Mexico or even better China.

Doug Henwood wrote:


> Michael Perelman wrote:
>
> >Interesting. You said that employment as not decreased all that much,
> >so then value added per manufacturing worker has not been increasing
> >much. Is that correct?
>
> Flattish employment plus a 32% increase in real value-added seems a
> bit more than "not much."
>
> Here are some more numbers.
>
> value- full-time VA/
> added equiv wkrs FTE
> 1992$mill (thous) 1992$
> 1987 1,041,675 18,594 56,022
> 1988 1,111,013 18,943 58,650
> 1989 1,105,992 18,992 58,235
> 1990 1,089,974 18,615 58,554
> 1991 1,050,216 18,004 58,332
> 1992 1,063,628 17,671 60,191
> 1993 1,100,823 17,662 62,327
> 1994 1,193,167 18,013 66,239
> 1995 1,271,556 18,188 69,912
> 1996 1,293,847 18,164 71,231
> 1997 1,369,889 18,339 74,698
>
> 1987-92 -4.3% -6.7% +2.6%
> 1992-97 +28.8% +3.8% +24.1%
>
> The Bush-era recession is visible in the first half of the stats, but
> the expansion in output between 1992 and 1997 is pretty strong, as is
> the VA/worker.
>
> Fresh numbers are due in early June.
>
> Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list