heh. who gives a crap about the dems. we have a bone to pick with the dems but it sure as shit ain't some nonsense about election bullshit.
kelley
At 09:18 AM 11/9/00 -0500, you wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Nov 2000, Christopher Susi wrote:
>
> > What does Bush being Gov of FL have to do with it? It only says to me that
> > the constituents have already shown they prefer right minded (pardon the
> > pun) reps over the dems. Geez, Gore lost in his own state. Maybe
> there was
> > massive fraud there, no?
> >
> > And the Buchanon thing, come-on. That's the way the votes were layed
> out in
> > many other areas. Perhaps we should have a nationwide re-election?
>
>[snip]
>
>Chris is braver than I, but I have to agree. The Dems have no shame, and
>are willing to do anything to get their candidate elected. Try to keep
>polls open in Dem districts, claim vote fraud by playing the racism card
>('why would a Jew ever vote for Buchanan?'), and demand that people who
>marked two candidates get a 'second chance'.
>
>At least the Reps don't pretend to be things they aren't - you know you're
>getting a bunch of big business big money folks there. Apparently the
>Dems vision of a democracy is to hold elections until their candidate
>wins.
>
>Chris is right to call bullshit regarding if the tide were turned. Where
>were all those vehement Rep protests when Kennedy beat Nixon in '60 thanks
>to Mayor "The police are here to preserve disorder" Daley and his dead
>voters?
>
>The whining about the EC and the FL vote, AFTER the election, is pathetic.
>Only people like Chuck0, who recognize the system as corrupt BEFORE the
>election, and protest the system instead of voting, have any moral high
>ground.
>
>
>Matt
>
>--
>Matt Cramer <cramer at voicenet.com>
>http://www.voicenet.com/~cramer/
>Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is
>force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful
>master. Never for a moment should it be left to
>irresponsible action.
> -George Washington