Summary of Nader analysis

jan carowan jancarowan at hotmail.com
Thu Nov 9 16:21:50 PST 2000


Discussion remains impossible here. I shall unsubscribe myself. With the warmest regards, Jan


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
>Subject: Re: Summary of Nader analysis
>Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2000 19:16:52 -0500
>
>jan carowan wrote:
>
>>I am free to say rude things about this fine writer because she is
>>not a paid subscriber of a publication with which I am associated.
>
>Which is?
>
>>Behind my fighting words there was reasoning which you are free to
>>engage. After listening to Ms Goodman's self proclaimed "critical"
>>interview of Mr Clinton and now reading your "counter" to my
>>criticism of Ms Ehrenreich, it seems clear to me that the
>>poststructuralist critique of reason has led to leftists thinking
>>that rational debate is a form of totalitarianism to be avoided at
>>any cost.
>
>Damn. You figured it out. What next?
>
>Doug

_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list