I think there are still questions about the accuracy of Volusia's recount: There are a number of discrepancies from the original count to the recount that the news-journal story doesn't answer on point:
11/7: Total Votes= 198,320 (http://elect.cbsig.net/campaign2000results/county/county_flop-0.html) 11/8: Total Votes= 183,256 (http://volusia.org/11-8c-00.htm)
7%V= percentage won in Volusia county (as reported 11/7). 7%S= percentage won in the rest of the state (all counties excluding Volusia). (as reported 11/7). 8%V= percentage won in Volusia county (as reported 11/8). MISSING VOTES=15064
GORE BUSH BUCHANAN NADER
BROWNE
11/7: 97,063 82,214 396 2,436
3,211
7%V: 48.94 41.45 .20 1.23
1.62
7%S: .4708 .4735 .284 1.581
.0262
11/8: 97,063 82,214 496 2,903
442
8%V 52.96 44.863 .2707 1.584
.2412
HAEGLIN HARRIS MCREYNOLDS MOOREHEAD PHILLIPS
33 9,888 3 59
2,927
7%V: .0166 4.99 .0015 .0297
1.48
7%S: .0375 .00973 .02124 .0295
.0227
11/8: 36 8 5 69
20
8%V: .0196 .0044 .00273 .03765
.0109
The final result of Volusia county may be clear upon a hand recount demanded by Gore officials. I believe that will occur this weekend. It is curious that there is no official explanation given by the county officials in charge of overseeing the recount. They reported that
"The Canvassing Board for Volusia County's general election
completed the state mandated recount of the Presidential vote
at 8 p.m., Wednesday, November 8. There were no changes in
the unofficial returns in the Presidential race. There are changes from the unofficial returns - the above numbers make that clear.
I'm wondering about the validity of the numbers in this county if there are changes in the vote totals of _every single candidate_ other than Gore and Bush from the original vote to the recount.
It unfortunately looks like my theory was wrong. There is still something going on in Volusia county, but it is not as significant as it initially looked.
Andy Martin University of Chicago
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20001110/243f8bfc/attachment.htm>