I don't doubt that Nader's best demographic was 18 to 29 year olds. But, to a lot of people like me 25 year olds' look like high schoolers.:o)
Tom
Seth Ackerman wrote:
> I suspect a lot of those under-$15,000 were students on a budget. Nader's
> best demographic was 18-29-year-olds.
>
> Seth
>
> > ----------
> > From: Doug Henwood[SMTP:dhenwood at panix.com]
> > Reply To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 6:13 PM
> > To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> > Subject: Re: FW: Re: [ASDnet] Max Sawicky on the election
> >
> > debsian at pacbell.net wrote:
> >
> > >Well, in the Nader vote there wasn't any working class.
> >
> > Eh? Nader got 4% of the under-$15,000 income, 3% of the
> > $15,000-30,000, and 2% of the higher brackets. Of those
> > self-identifying as working class, Nader got 3%, compared with 2% for
> > the self-i.d.'d middle class.
> >
> > Doug
> >