Summary of Nader analysis

Justin Schwartz jkschw at hotmail.com
Sat Nov 11 01:29:30 PST 2000


Oops! Should say: had Nader not RUN not not WON. --jks


>I agree with Max that the explnatioon for liberal Nader-blaming is not fear
>of material loss in the most part, but I disagree that it is a sort of
>shame
>at being shown up as somehow "ordinary" by extremists to one's left. That
>might bother leftists, but not liberals--not much. I thinkit is rather a
>more common phenonemon: blaming the safe target. Ofa ll the counterfactual
>factors to pick out of the campaign that might have gone differently, it is
>easierst to imagine victoty had Nader not won, particularly because that
>way
>it doesn't have to be faced that the Dems screwed up. It makesjust as much
>sense--maybe more--to blame the Florida Dems fora pproving the Palm Beach
>Ballot that cost Gore 20,000 votes, and the legality of which the campaign
>is now challenging, but why blame yourself and your friends when you can
>blame your (weak) antagonists? --jks

_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list