another reason Marx was wrong

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Tue Nov 21 12:14:18 PST 2000


"Das Human Kapital"

BY: ODED GALOR

Brown University

Department of Economics

OMER MOAV

Hebrew University

Department of Economics

Document: Available from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection:

http://papers.ssrn.com/paper.taf?abstract_id=246295

Other Electronic Document Delivery:

http://econ.pstc.brown.edu/faculty/galor/index.html

SSRN only offers technical support for papers

downloaded from the SSRN Electronic Paper Collection

location. When URLs wrap, you must copy and paste

them into your browser eliminating all spaces.

Paper ID: Brown University Working Paper No. 2000-17

Date: September 2000

Contact: OMER MOAV

Email: Mailto:msmoav at mscc.huji.ac.il

Postal: Hebrew University

Department of Economics

Mount Scopus

Jerusalem, 91905 ISRAEL

Phone: 972-25883121

Fax: 972-2-5816071

Co-Auth: ODED GALOR

Email: Mailto:Oded_Galor at brown.edu

Postal: Brown University

Department of Economics

Providence, RI 02912 USA

ABSTRACT:

This paper hypothesizes that the demise of the 19th century's

European class structure reflects a deliberate transformation of

society orchestrated by the Capitalists. Contrary to

conventional wisdom, it argues that the demise of this class

structure has been an outcome of a cooperative rather than a

divisive process. The research suggests that the transition from

this class structure may be viewed as the outcome of an optimal

reaction process of the Capitalists to the increasing importance

of human capital in sustaining their profit rates. The paper

argues that the process of capital accumulation has gradually

intensified the relative scarcity of labor and has generated an

incentive to augment labor via human capital accumulation. Due

to the complementarity between physical and human capital in

production, the Capitalists were among the prime beneficiaries

of the potential accumulation of human capital by the masses.

They had therefore the incentive to financially support public

education that would sustain their profit rates and would

improve their economic well being, although would ultimately

undermine their dynasty's position in the social ladder. The

support for public education is unanimous despite the fact that

the Capitalists carry the prime financial burden of public

schooling. That is, due to the co-existence of credit market

imperfections and capital-skill complementarity, the

redistribution associated with public education is Pareto

improving. Had Karl Marx been exposed to Gary Becker's Human

Capital theory, the socio-political experience of the 20th

century might have unfolded in a strikingly different manner.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list