You should have picked up a copy of the "tentative politics" issue of Kenning just under a year ago when it was offered for sale on this list. Better yet, it sounds like you should have contributed to it. It's archived at various University libraries if you're curious. Anyhow, your notion is being formulated by poets / artists across the country, examples of which you'll find there. Kenning v.2 no.3.
Patrick
----- Original Message ----- From: "Carrol Cox" <cbcox at ilstu.edu> To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2000 3:05 PM Subject: Re: Addiction, Advertising, & Easy Virtue (was Re: How far do we go?)
>
>
> Nancy Bauer/Dennis Perrin wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes, Carrol, they do have every right to be as prudish and as humorless
and
> > as pedantic as they possibly can -- just as you enjoy your right
> > (beautifully on display here) to be cranky and predictably contrarian.
Ain't
> > life grand?
>
> Actually, this is just a parenthesis from something I've been thinking
about
> for several years but have never formulated to my own satisfaction. I
won't
> try to argue it now but I'll give it a sort of title: "The essential
incoherence
>
> and bad faith of almost all criticism of the left by leftists." Someone
says
> smugly, You leftists think you know so much more that the masses." That
> someone is arrogantly claiming to know so much more than other
> leftists. It is also a lie because that person *knows* that his/her basic
> princples compel him/her to believe that he/she knows so much more
> than all those people who approve of lynching or all those people who
> engage in fag-bashing or all those people who approve vigorously of
> humanitarian bombing or all those people who go around thinking
> that other people shouldn't have any fun. . . . . .
>
> All attacks on Dogmatism reveal themselves on inspection to be
> the worst sort of egotistical dogmatism. Thank myself that I am
> not as others.
>
> Carrol
>