silly holes

[snit]

At 12:13 PM 11/27/00 -0500, Wojtek Sokolowski wrote:
>At 12:18 PM 11/27/00 -0500, kelley wrote:
> >porn they see all around them in other venues.  it's wrong to ask questions
> >that are, essentially, questions of epistemology and ontology?
>
>
>That is precisely the problem.  The epistemology and onology of sex is in
>its praxis - while theorizing about it seems an utterly pathetic exercise
>in (i) vicariousness, (ii) shock treatment (iii) both.
>
>wojtek

a statement that reflects an epistemological and ontological position.  we 
aren't talking about sex, but representations of sex and sexuality.  nice 
try at chaning the topic.

party on.

you and uday and others remind me of my students who don't want to question 
anything.

fine. enjoy. revel in the putrid filth you wallow in and call it 
"consciousness"

kelley