Eric the non-red

Doug Henwood dhenwood at panix.com
Mon Nov 27 19:07:32 PST 2000


Eric Alterman writes:


> When it was over, the rule of the mob was triumphant. The
>three canvassers voted to walk away from the recount whose tally
>would likely have led to Al Gore's victory over George Bush in
>Florida and in the presidential election. One of its members, David
>Leahy, acknowledged the protests were a factor in his decision. The
>other two, perhaps fearful of their safety, declined all interviews.
>As the mob celebrated its victory, its Republican Party masterminds
>transferred their mobile home/base of operations to Broward County,
>where they employed the same tactics against that county's
>canvassers on Friday.
> Some conservative pundits have gone so far as to celebrate
>the triumph of mob rule over democracy and rule of law. Paul Gigot,
>a commentator for PBS's "NewsHour" and the Wall Street Journal
>editorial page, praised what he termed the "bourgeois riot." Gigot
>reporting from the scene, witnessed John Sweeney, a visiting GOP
>monitor, telling an aide, "Shut it down," and thereby inspiring what
>he called the "semi-spontaneous combustion" that forced the counters
>to "cave in."

Well what the fuck is wrong with mob rule? It just depends on which mob. The Dems could have tapped the AFL-CIO, bourgeois feminism, the civil rights establishment, students, and other agitators to put a million in the streets. But they can't do that. If they did that, it'd look like revolution, and the capitalist version of the people's party wouldn't dare do that. That's why the Democrats have to be destroyed.

Doug



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list