Reasonable suspicion

[JKSCHW at aol.com]

Hey, that was the Warren court, allegedly the good guys. --jks

In a message dated Mon, 2 Oct 2000  5:23:39 PM Eastern Daylight Time, "Charles Brown" <CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us> writes:

<< 


>>> JKSCHW at aol.com 10/02/00 05:07PM >>>

CB: By the way, since probable cause is the constitutional standard, how is it that reasonable suspicion passes constitutional muster ?

 >>

Take it up with the Supreme Court, who said it was in Terry. --jks

(((((((((((((((

CB: Yes, Stop and Frisk. Just seems a patently , logically wrong decision.

 I ain't about to say anything to the Supreme Hoods. 

 >>