>nathan asked
>
>What "working class voice"? Surely not mine?
obviously not. I said, "the appropriation of the "working class" voice".
key word: appropriation.
> I'm not even sure of the
>application here since I was making as much an argument about racial and
>gender issues as class differences.
oh? working class people are what now? some mysterious entity where there are no women, no men, no whites, no blacks, no latinos, no asians, etc? they have "class" and only "class" and their concerns have nothing to do with race or gender oppression.
okey dokey!
kelley