Needs

Juan Jose Barrios jota at netgate.com.uy
Wed Oct 4 09:46:26 PDT 2000


interesting topic. One question comes to my mind: should we consider needs, tastes and preferences as something given to the economic analysis or would it be more correct to take account of the effects of present consumption on future consumption, that is, needs and preferences are endougenous (on a strict economic sense). Note that, supply conditions may influence future consumption patterns if they manage to influence current consumption patterns.jj

JKSCHW at aol.com wrote:


> Surely not all needs are artificial: we need certain minimum dietary requirements; protection from exposure to extremes of heat and cold; and indeed--although the form of these will of course vary--love, attention, and engagement with activities that use and develop our capacities. Marx knew this. See Norman Geras, Marx and Human Nature: Refutation of a Legend; also J. Archbald Petty and (an older book) Vernon Venable on Marx and Human Nature. --jks
>
> Well, OK, but I think that Marx's point is that ALL NEEDS are
> artificial.
>
> Per cent of disposable income spent on food
>
> Year US UK
> 50 20.6 -
> 55 18.8 -
> 60 17.4 35
> 65 15 31.1
> 70 13.8 25
> 75 13.9 22.7
> 80 13.4 20.9
> 85 12 18.4
> 90 11.6 15.8
> 95 10.9 13.9
> 99 - 12.8
>
> According to the Rowntree Trust survey those things that are considered
> necessities has expanded considerably, (a consequence of past
> productivity increases). More than half those interviewed considered the
> following to be necessities: annual holiday away from home (not with
> relatives), television, telephone, deep freezer/fridge freezer, insuring
> home contents, hobby or leisure activity, washing machine (September 11,
> 2000).
>
> In message <s9d9f2c6.009 at mail.ci.detroit.mi.us>, Charles Brown
> <CharlesB at CNCL.ci.detroit.mi.us> writes
> >CB: In the case of gym shoes , they add to my rich individuality as a use-value
> >in running and playing sports ( actually a need that persists from the human
> >phase of what Mandel calls primitive natural needs, from the exilharation and
> >pleasure of using muscles to the feel good of better health; although even 200,
> >000 years ago there were historically created needs, probably sports). Getting
> >harassed because my gym shoes are out of style with the Nike type merely
> >detracts and distracts from my fulfillment of my rich individuality.
>
> No, I think running is a small part of the pleasure of running shoes.
> Otherwise, why Nike? To treat such symbolic hierarchies as without
> substance is to become otherworldly.
>
> >
> >In general, not every commodity coming out of the bourgeois cornucopia enhances
> >our rich individualities, and the "keeping up with the Jones" phenomenon often
> >represses our individual potentials.
>
> But 'keeping up with the Joneses' is an important thing for Marx who
> says in Wage Labour and Capital, that a modest home becomes a lowly
> hovel next to a palace. His point is that it is not the absolute
> physical needs htat are important, but one's social needs relative to
> other people - in principle, he means the contrast between profits and
> wages, as expressed in consumption goods.
>
> The idea that one should not want to 'keep up with the Joneses' is
> capitalist ideology.
>
> --
> James Heartfield
>
> Great Expectations: the creative industries in the New Economy
> is available from Design Agenda,
> 4.27 The Beaux Arts Building,
> 10-18 Manor Gardens,
> London, N7 6JT
> Price 7.50 GBP + 1GBP p&p
> >>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list