nah. those came from another list where they went unrefuted and were, as far as i know, taken as the Word. no one questioned the veracity of any of them, tho a discussin did ensue about gush and whether he is reponsible for the death penalty and educational improvement that he claims when someone asked about something similar indicting bush. this kind of belief in the veracity of the statements was, of course, registered by a bunch of paranoid, cynical hackers who are supposed to be keen to this sort of thing! go figure.
my guess is that the strategy is to use the Internet to disseminate this sort of thing and build up support or lack thereof for candidates on the basis of seemingly serious and accurate statements.
kelley