> I can find no case satisfying that description under the Westlaw 5th
> Cir. database or under the S.Ct database for cert granted. More details,
> like a cite? --jks
Here's the only article I saved. I couldn't find it on Findlaw (I don't have an account for Westlaw, as IANAL), but then again Findlaw only seems to list decisions, not schedules or dockets.
For the conspiracy theorists, I was unable to locate this article in the back issues of the Liberator Online; this is issue 12, and the archives stop at issue 10.
Caution lefty friends: don't visit self-gov.org without first being prepared for dangerous libertarian ideas.
Matt
-- Matt Cramer <cramer at voicenet.com> http://www.voicenet.com/~cramer/ I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.
-Prof
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:07:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Advocates for Self-Government <advo at best.com> Reply-To: liberator-request at theadvocates.org To: liberator at theadvocates.org Subject: Liberator OnLine, Vol. 5, No. 12
<snip>
THE LIBERATOR ONLINE
June 28, 2000
Vol. 5, No. 12
Circulation: over 40,000 in 94 countries
Published by the Advocates for Self-Government.
Created and edited by Paul Schmidt, mailto:paul at self-gov.org
Co-edited by James W. Harris, mailto:james at self-gov.org
_________________________________________________________________
GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS, UNBELIEVABLE NEWS
by James W. Harris
<snip> [This is an excert from a digest of articles - MSC]
U.S. Department of Justice: Americans Have No Gun Rights
The Clinton Justice Department has made its position on the Second
Amendment shockingly plain and clear: there is no Constitutional right
to buy, sell or own any firearm, and the government can take weapons
away from you any time it chooses.
The astonishing remarks came on Tuesday June 13, during oral arguments
in the case of U.S. v. Emerson in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case involves a routine restraining order placed on Dr. Timothy
Emerson, issued while he was going through a divorce. Since 1994,
federal law has prohibited possession of a firearm by a person under a
restraining order -- even if, as in this case, there is no threat of
violence.
Dr. Emerson - who was totally unaware of this obscure federal statute,
as was the judge who issued the restraining order - was subsequently
arrested for owning a pistol. He challenged the law. On March 30,
1999, U.S. District Judge Sam R. Cummings of Lubbock, Texas declared
that the statute, because it prohibited gun ownership without finding
any threat of violence, violated Dr. Emerson's Second Amendment right
to own firearms and was thus unconstitutional.
The U.S. Justice Department appealed, and the result was one of the
most dramatic gun rights court arguments in U.S. history.
According to witnesses, Judge William L. Garwood, the senior judge,
seemed startled by the government's statist interpretation of the
Second Amendment.
Here are some excerpts from the oral arguments, as recorded by
observer (and radio talk show host) Tom Gresham:
Judge Garwood (to U.S. Department of Justice attorney Meteja): "You
are saying that the Second Amendment is consistent with a position
that you can take guns away from the public? You can restrict
ownership of rifles, pistols and shotguns from all people? Is that the
position of the United States?"
U.S. Department of Justice attorney Meteja: "Yes."
Metaja argued that the Second Amendment only applied to members of the
National Guard.
Judge Garwood: "Is it the position of the United States that persons
who are not in the National Guard are afforded no protections under
the Second Amendment?"
Meteja: "Exactly."
Meteja added that even members of the National Guard had Second
Amendment protection only for guns issued or used in the Guard.
Judge Garwood: "Membership in the National Guard isn't enough? What
else is needed?"
Meteja: "The weapon in question must be used in the National Guard."
Metaja further argued that the federal government had the right to
regulate guns and gun ownership because of the interstate commerce
clause of the Constitution. Because a firearm may have once traveled
across state lines, the government presumes a gun is somehow involved
in "interstate commerce," thus giving the federal government
regulatory power over it.
In response, Judge DeMoss asked, "I have a 16-gauge shotgun in my
closet at home. I have a 20-gauge shotgun. I also have a 30-caliber
rifle at home. Are you saying these are 'in or affecting interstate
commerce?'"
Meteja: "Yes."
Witnesses say the judges seemed very unimpressed with the federal
government's arguments. At one point, Judge Robert M. Parker
commented: "You shouldn't let it bother your sleep that Judge Garwood
and I, between us, own enough guns to start a revolution in most South
American countries."
A ruling can come any time this year, with the potential to propel the
issue -including the key question of whether the Second Amendment does
in fact protect an individual right to keep and bear arms -- into the
Supreme Court.
(Sources: Neal Knox/Shotgun News; Tom Gresham; WorldNetDaily.com)
"The Constitution shall never be construed..."
"[T]he said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize
Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of
conscience; or to prevent the people of the United who are
peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms..."
-- Samuel Adams, 1788.
* * *
"Good News, Bad News, Unbelievable News" writer James W. Harris is
co-editor of the Liberator Online. His articles have appeared in
numerous magazines and newspapers, including The Nation, Reason, The
Freeman, the National Taxpayers Union's Dollars and Sense, the Atlanta
Constitution, and many more. He has been a Finalist in the Mencken
Awards, given by the Free Press Association for "Outstanding
Journalism in Support of Liberty."
_________________________________________________________________ <snip yet again>
See you in two weeks! You can contact the Advocates at:
Snail Mail:
Advocates for Self Government
1202 N. Tennessee St. Suite 202
Cartersville, GA 30120
Phone: 770-386-8372; for orders, 800-932-1776
Fax: 770-386-8373
Email: mailto:advocates at self-gov.org
If you wish to subscribe, unsubscribe, or change your address for
receiving the Liberator OnLine, visit:
http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/maintain.html
You can see back issues of the Liberator OnLine on the Advocates' web
site: http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/
The Advocates for Self-Government is a non-profit educational
organization. Our purpose is to present the freedom philosophy
honestly and persuasively to opinion-makers so that they can
encounter, evaluate, and when ready, embrace the ideals of
self-government.
Contributions are tax deductible under Section 501(c)(3) of the IRS
code. If you would like to support the Advocates, we *welcome* your
donation. To support the Advocates' work, see
http://www.self-gov.org/donate.html -- or give us a call at
1-800-932-1776.
"May it be to the world... to assume the blessings and security of
self-government." -- Thomas Jefferson