>I'm not even advocating genetic superiority, just stated that we all start
>off with differing chances of surival based on a number of factors,
>location, resources, and even genes. If one person or group is successfull
>are they some how obligated to everyone and anyone that isn't to make sure
>they can survive?
No. Every one for him or herself. Only the fittest survive. The war of each against all. The inferior must die out for the good of the rest.
What brought you here?
Doug