Reich on mediocrity of middle ground (why not blame the elect orate instead?)

Mikalac Norman S NSSC MikalacNS at NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL
Mon Oct 30 07:52:19 PST 2000


thanks to the internet, US citizens have 24 parties to choose from - maybe fewer in some states, but many more than 2 nontheless. if they can't find something exciting to vote about in any of them, then maybe it's because they are too lazy to look around.

IOW, please stop blaming the candidates for a small voter turnout. if the citizens prefer to watch soap operas rather than study the issues, then they can stay home and get what they deserve.

norm ------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Gordon Fitch [mailto:gcf at panix.com] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:25 AM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Re: Reich on mediocrity of middle ground


> The Mediocrity Of The Middle Ground
> by Robert B. Reich

Reich's analysis seems incorrect to me. The application of more sophisticated technology should enable one to do more with less. If the aim were to get voters excited about the election and the candidates, advanced marketing techniques could be expected to use fairly modest resources to create passionate responses, leading to an unstable electorate and the likelihood of landslides and upsets. But this is not what we observe in the present case. I conclude that either advanced marketing techniques are not being used or, if they are in use, the intent is to make the election close and dull rather than exciting or lopsided. Since the present conformation of powers suits imperial Capital very well, the latter is my guess; the deadness Reich whines about is the deadness of victory. The last thing a liberal can desire in these days, when the silk purse and the pig's ear have become one and the same, is the reapparance of political struggle.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list