> The following, from the 16/9 Science News, is only one of many
> refutations of the manic doomsday pessimism of Mr. Jones:
how does this refute mark's post? this Science News abstract describes something in a lab, a cool result the way they've sandwiched the layers of photo-electricity and conversion to hydrogen together, but how does this relate to the issues mark jone's raises? whats at stake is not simply what can be produced in a laboratory and reported in a technical journal, but what can be deployed now or soon that will make a sizeable difference in energy budgets and anthropgenic climate forcing. you're arguments have to be more forceful than bob dylan song snippets ...
what will they think of next???
http://www.gemicrogen.com/homegen_prod_desc.html
les schaffer