My understanding of the old debate about the origins of capitalism was that one side had the internalist thesis that it was a classic relations/forces of production story about feudalism, with no causal role for the relations of Europe with the ROTW; the externalist thesis on the other side claimed that those relations with the ROTW played a primary causal role--providing the 'primitive' accumulation, plus the triangular/quadrangular trade, and later colonialism, neo-colonialism, imperialism opening up markets for goods and providing raw materials, etc. But I never remembered any part about capitalism itself being borrowed from elsewhere, it was built on the backs of the ROTW.
-----Original Message----- From: Doug Henwood [mailto:dhenwood at panix.com] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 3:33 PM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Re: FW: 8 Eurocentric Historians
debsian at pacbell.net quoted the inimitable James Blaut:
>For
>these
>scholars, the origins of capitalism are European.
I'm confused. If Europe is to be condemned for colonizing the world, and Europe certainly deserves lots of condemnation for that, it must have diffused something in the process. I could swear that diffused something had something to do with capitalism, but I'm no historian, I'm just a journalist.
Doug