The net effect of the overproduction on the public aspect of discourse has been counterrevolutionary. This would not be the first time capitalist overproduction has had a counterrevolutionary effect - look at the over-proliferation of TV, automobile and suburb, to cite some salient examples. What to do with the inheritance of all this crap will be a real problem for any post-capitalist society. But I digress - the point here is that this is an objective process, not a conspiracy of "bad" intellectuals. The solution is not to "go back" to traditional forms of public presentation, but to create new forms out of the new material. This is actually one of the tasks of the reconstruction of the working class and socialist movement - one that faces us _immediately_, and not at some forlornly remote point in the future. The enthusiastic (re)creation of our public language in connection with real struggles will be a healthy source of optimism and a antidote to the cynicism that pervades American leftism. Until then, there is no free speech without real public speech that ruptures the daily repression of social space almost totally occupied by privatized discourse here in the US.
But did you read Kagarlitskys' article? He is currently on a speaking tour in the US and will speak at UC Berkeley this Friday (04/06). I plan to go - wanna report?
-Brad Mayer Oakland, CA
>Right. And if it weren't for Jacques Derrida, the revolutionary
>moment would already have arrived!
>
>Doug
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ I wander through each chartered street
Near where the chartered Thames does flow And mark in every face I meet,
Marks of weakness, marks of woe.
In every cry of every man,
In every infant's cry of fear, In every voice, in every ban,
The mind forged manacles I hear
-Blake, at the beginning of time $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$