Another recount

[Seth Ackerman]

Hmm. The Herald's website says the recount results will be published at 11
p.m. tonight and that we should check back then. Where did you find this?

Seth


> ----------
> From: 	Leslilake1 at aol.com[SMTP:Leslilake1 at aol.com]
> Reply To: 	lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Sent: 	Tuesday, April 03, 2001 8:19 PM
> To: 	lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Subject: 	Another recount
> 
> It seems to me this is the third media-sponsored recount I've read about.
> 
> The first, if I'm remembering correctly, proved Bush won.  The second,
> that 
> Gore did.  This one, Bush again.  In my more paranoid moments I can't help
> 
> but think that these sorts of confusing/contradictory announcements are
> made 
> with the deliberate intention to confuse people so thoroughly that they
> won't 
> have the confidence to do anything other than shrug and say, "Well, what
> can 
> you do?"  Which I hear on an almost daily basis about one thing or another
> 
> lately....
> 
> 
> BUSH WINS MASSIVE HERALD RECOUNT 
> 
> Source: KNIGHT RIDDER
> Posted on 04/03/2001 16:55:16 PDT by guise 
> 
> 
> MIAMI - President Bush's victory in Florida, which gave him the White 
> House, almost certainly would have endured even if a manual ballot 
> recount stopped by the U.S. Supreme Court had been allowed to go 
> forward. In fact, a comprehensive review of 64,248 ballots in all 67 
> Florida counties by The Miami Herald; its parent company, Knight Ridder; 
> and USA Today found that the 537-vote margin of Bush, a Republican, 
> would have increased to 1,665 votes under the counting standards 
> advocated by supporters of Democrat Al Gore. 
>