And Edward Shorter discusses the other matter among many other distressing details in that great book A HISTORY OF WOMEN'S BODIES.
Christopher Rhoades Dÿkema
Doug Henwood wrote:
> Forstater, Mathew wrote:
>
> >but name anyone who has ever supported the position that we go back to
> >'becoming' 'pre-capitalist' not using any technology, medicine,
> >knowledge, etc.
> >discovered in the interim? not even the most romantic golden agers take this
> >position. but we can learn lots about both capitalism and post-capitalism by
> >studying noncapitalist modes, as well as gain insights into things like
> >sustainable ecological practices, institutional forms of
> >cooperation, etc. much
> >more than both many marxist and bourgeois scholars recognize.
>
> But how completely can you separate "technology, medicine, knowledge,
> etc." from the modes of social organization - large-scale
> enterprise, to name just one - that make it possible? And how can you
> lift the bits you like from non- or precapitalist societies? Isn't it
> fetishizing both technology and social organization to treat them as
> so easily separable, even in thought?
>
> Doug