creative financing
Maureen Anderson
manders at uchicago.edu
Wed Apr 18 21:19:49 PDT 2001
>Credit fraud is a crime, as is mail fraud and wire fraud. I'd advise
>aaginst committing it. You can go to jail. --jks
Now, now Justin: despite painstaking efforts to assure that I was
engaging in an Abstract Thought Exercise, you're just determined to
read it as a practical query. But exploring the dynamics of our
political-financial system is one of lbo-talk's raisons d'etre and in
that spirit I invited theoretical analysis of a fascinating
confluence of social facts.
Social fact 1: credit card companies are currently thrusting
exorbitant credit limits upon segments of the population.
For instance I regularly receive unsolicited "rewards,"
amounting to tens of thousands of dollars of credit, for my
"financial responsibility." After getting their approving dad-like
pat on the head I get the siren songs, of the dream vacation in Bora
Bora that I uniquely deserve, the house addition to that'll make me
complete, etc. (Of course what they won't tell me, have killed
congressional proposals trying to make them tell me, is how many
years at their interest rate it would take to pay back my carpe diem
expenditures.) They've sent me all these credit increases at the
same time that my income has almost qualified for Earned Income
Credits.
Social fact 2: the present structure of higher education makes it
increasingly likely that students, especially graduate students in
humanities and social sciences, will accrue enormous student loan
debt.
Social fact 3: institutional structures (to say nothing of moral
ones) mitigate strongly against reneging on gov't student loans.
Social fact 4: the student population likely to be highly indebted by
gov't loans correlates highly with the segment of the population
receiving high credit limits from the bottom-feeding credit card
companies.
This array of social facts present interesting material for social
analysis. My theoretical understanding of the finance system and
its mutual imbrications in the sociopolitical realm would be enlarged
if anyone here could indicate possible institutional factors or
regulatory procedures that might mitigate against the elective
affinity I perceive here between the confluence of social facts
enumerated above, and the possibility of a segment of the student
population choosing to pay off their gov't loans via the funds made
available by their credit cards, after which they might subsequently
and regrettably feel compelled to file for bankruptcy.
inquiring social analytical minds wanna know,
Maureen
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list