Singer's critics lambaste him for attributing a similar right to life of adult apes and people on the ground they are both persons. What you SAY is much more radical than anything Singer has ever said.
Did you MEAN that it is preposterous arrogance for him to assert that not all members of the human species have an equal right to life? Even that would contradict the vast majority of those who are pro-choice. Do you take the standard "conservative" position that all members of the human species, including zygotes, conceptus, etc. have the same right to life?
----- Original Message -----
From: Marta Russell <ap888 at lafn.org>
To: <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com>
>
> > For Singer, life is not something to which all beings have an equal
right.
>
> I understand that -- his arrogance is just preposterous.
>