>I am astounded and appalled that this is all you've heard from everybody's
>posts on this. If you think I'm arguing--or Justin, or Dennis--that
>arguments don't matter, your own ability to communicate is severely
>impaired.
>
>Miles
i pretty much agree with ken. very few criticisms have been raised that make any sense. i post at length explaining it all and not one of you has bothered to engage what i've written. now, sure, you might not have time to learn what it is we're talking about, but then, why bother other than you're just interested in railing against H like some here rail against Judith Butler or Singer or whomever.
your kneejerk concerns about ethnocentrism were based on a lack of understanding about how rationality/reason was being used--this despite the fact that i know i've posted tons of k's on the topic in the past month. you shifted ground to claim that you were talking about tradition...okay...but then pointed out something that was ALREADY addressed here in this and related threads.
kelley