>
>How does it need any justification. You said it. He owns the list. We
>are still living under capitalism, where ownership counts for a lot. And
>if he misused those powers of ownership the penalty would not be being
>labelled "unjust" or "unjustifiable" but suddenly finding himself the
>owner of a list with no subscribers on it that interested him.
hee hee. but you just provided habermas's argument!
i'll bet ken is laughing way harder than i am.
kelley