Well, John, sometimes we must be cruel to be kind, though in Hess's case, cruelty, or rudeness if you will, doesn't seem to be based on anything other than spite.
For the record, I first met Hess in the late 80s, when I was hired to write a media column for the-then young New York Observer. He and I shared an office with Doug Ireland (who once kicked my briefcase across the office because he didn't like it on the floor), and Hess was to be my editor of sorts. He was incredibly literal-minded, and routinely chopped up my work so it would sound more like his. Fortunately, I soon left the paper, and Hess, and continued my work at FAIR.
Hess would shuffle into the FAIR office now and again, and was always curt and short. Yet, for some reason, I had respect for him, and defended him in a debate I had with Paul Berman about Central America (he and Berman had clashed in the letters section of the Nation over the contras). But then, at some FAIR party, Hess and I rated which Third World countries could give the US a decent fight. I said that despite its poverty, North Korea wouldn't be a pushover the way Iraq was. After all, they fought the US to a draw in the 50s. Hess went off and berated me for my stupidity. He was extremely caustic and rude. Now, this was dumb party banter. Who really knows if the North Koreans would roll over or not? But to Hess it was something bigger. I never spoke to him again.
If Hess is so opposed to Leid, why is he providing her with copy? Why does he willingly appear on a hijacked network?
DP