But that's whole different issue, isn't it? Keynes showed the economic mechanism by which a monetary authority could ensure low or no unemployment. But the political issue of unemployment (uppity workers, etc.) is quite separate from the economic question.
But here's the real question: while Keynes's recomendations were never adopted wholehaearted, for several decades after WWII, the were adopted enough in most of the west to allow virtually no unemployment. Then, right about the time Nixon claimed that everyone was a Keynesian, it seems the ruling class lost it's faith in Keynesian solutions, and unemployment started to rise.
So what happened? Did the ruling class just decide that it could no longer afford full employment, or did the experience of the seventies (when the conventional wisdom had it that "Keynesian solutions failed") make them fall back on neoclassical ideas about "sound finance" that they never had real stopped beleiveing anyway? Are the ruling classes evil (in knowing how to prevent unemployment, while choosing not to in order to increase their power) or just stupid?
Jim Baird
Doug, you seem to attribute every economic policy
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com