Is this guy any relation to Johny Appleseed?
I dont know what significance the comparison between Afghanistan now and under the Soviet Union, except if the point is that WSJ is trying to do a "mea culpa" for certain segments of the bourgeoisie.
On the one hand, I am sure that the American powers-that-be would prefer to have Afghanistan consolidated into a real State...with a real central government (which they might speculate could have happened, had they not aided the anti-soviet forces). However I am not sure that was really happening under the Soviets (except in the areas around Kabul)...Maybe it was. But from my scant knowledge of Afghan history, the attempts to forge a central govt there have been ephemeral. Someone correct me if I am wrong.
On another line of thinking, numerous Iranian revolutionaries in Paris after the Iranian revolution told me that, in truth, they were better off before the overthrow of the Shah. That does not mean that we should support a return to the monarchy in Iran.
The question of Afghanistan is a thorny one. Forcing any type of government on the Afghan people, especially a foreign one, is not going to work (whether Soviet Style or any other)...or so it seems to me.
Thomas
--- Chris Kromm <ckromm at mindspring.com> wrote:
> From my favorite Southern populist, Tom Turnipseed
> of South Carolina.
> CK
>
> Published on Wednesday, December 5, 2001
> http://www.turnipseed.net
>
> The Wall Street Journal and The Workers Vanguard
> Agree: Both Capitalists and
> Communists Conclude Afghanistan Better Off Under
> Soviets Than Northern
> Alliance
>
> by Tom Turnipseed
>
> The Wall Street Journal, the leading global
> newspaper of business, is
> published by Dow Jones and Company who also operate
> the world's most widely
> followed stock-market indicator tracking the world's
> largest stock market.
> The Workers Vanguard, is a Marxist working class
> biweekly of the Spartacist
> League of the United States, which is the U. S.
> Section of the International
> Communist League.
>
> Drawing from Cold War history and the present war in
> Afghanistan, both have
> published recent articles that agree Afghanistan was
> better off under Soviet
> control than that of the Northern Alliance.
>
> In the December 4, 2001 edition of the Journal, Alan
> Cullison reports from
> Kabul, Afghanistan on living conditions when the
> Soviets were there under a
> heading of "Soviet-Era Vision of Afghanistan Gains
> New Life in Ruins of
> Kabul Neighborhood." Cullison story leads with, "In
> the wrecked remnants of
> what was once one of Kabul's most prestigious
> neighborhoods, American bombs
> have stirred a fragile and ironic hope: the revival
> of a Soviet-era vision
> of Afghanistan whose destruction Washington used to
> trumpet as its greatest
> Cold War triumph." Cullison then quotes Siarah
> Parlika, one of the oldest
> residents of the Soviet-built Microrayon
> neighborhood, who said, "It used to
> be beautiful-there was glass in our windows and we
> had gardens."
>
> Then the Cold War turned Afghanistan into a proxy
> battleground between
> Washington and Moscow and destroyed model
> communities like Microrayon. Mr.
> Cullison says, "It also trampled the first shoots of
> a secular political
> class more interested in living standards than
> religious dogma." The story
> reveals that the Soviets built swimming pools,
> shops, and schools to serve
> the complex that housed 140,000 people and that
> attendance at the schools
> was compulsory for boys and girls. It also reported
> that "Soviet-era
> Microrayon represented a vision of Afghanistan's
> future far more in tune
> with the West than the religious zealotry of the
> U.S.-backed mujahedeen
> fighters who drove the Soviets from Afghanistan in
> 1989."
>
> The mujahedeen then overthrew the government left
> behind by the Soviets
> in1992 and turned Microrayan and the capitol city of
> Kabul into a no-man's
> land as they battled among themselves for spoils.
> The Journal reported that
> the apartments were occupied and looted by a
> succession of Northern Alliance
> warlords. Stray rockets hit a city power plant and
> Microrayan's heating
> plant knocking out heat, lights and running water in
> 1993 and thieves
> emptied the schools of their desks and chairs. When
> the Taliban took over in
> 1996 they abolished the study of math, geography and
> history and would not
> allow the girls to go to school. Cullison reported
> that now, " herds of
> goats root through apartment courtyards"...and,
> "Most of the doctors,
> teachers and government technocrats that were the
> neighborhood's original
> residents fled."
>
> Also in the December 4 edition of the Wall Street
> Journal, Andrew Higgins
> wrote from Kabul that, "Anti-Taliban troops who last
> month captured the key
> northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif have begun fighting
> among themselves,
> prompting the United Nations to evacuate
> international staff from the area
> and raising fears of a violent rift in the
> U.S.-backed Northern Alliance."
> What's new! Higgins said the fighting among the
> Northern Alliance threatens
> to "badly blemish American strategy in Afghanistan:
> instead of bringing
> peace, the defeat of the Taliban regime ignites a
> new round of conflict
> among victors." Although Kabul has been relatively
> peaceful, other areas
> under the Northern Alliance control have also
> experienced unrest and
> violence. There are three main factions or ethnic
> groups involved: the
> Tajiks, the Uzbeks and Hazaras. The Tajiks and
> Uzbeks are Sunni Muslims
> whose roots are in the two former Soviet republics
> of Tajikistan and
> Uzbekistan and the Hazaras are Shiite Muslims who
> are supported by Iran.
> Higgins reported that "the potentially explosive
> ethnic, religious and
> political fissures...risk dividing Afghanistan into
> a jumble of warlord
> fiefdoms."
>
> The Workers Vanguard of November 30, 2001 was
> headlined "U.S.-Backed Killers
> Take Kabul" and reported, "the Northern Alliance
> cutthroats are already
> displaying the internecine feuding and murderous
> barbarity of their four
> years of power in the mid-1990s." The Vanguard said
> the Northern Alliance
> was "Hailed as 'liberators' by Washington and the
> Western media", and "media
> mouth-pieces have portrayed the Northern Alliance as
> bearers of freedom for
> the Afghan masses, especially women." The Vanguard
> said during the four
> years the Northern Alliance ruled Afghanistan
> (1992-1996), "they killed
> countless civilians, perpetrated mass rapes and
> enslaved women in the veil,"
> and that "The display of crocodile tears by American
> rulers for the enslaved
> women of Afghanistan is the most repulsive
> hypocrisy." It calls Osama bin
> Laden and the Taliban "Islamic fundamentalist
> killers unleashed by the U.S.
> in the 1980s against the soviet Red Army."
>
> The Vanguard newspaper, published in New York, said,
> "the Soviet military
> presence there was one of the few truly progressive
> acts carried out by the
> Stalinist bureaucracy, which brought the only hope
> of emancipation for the
> hideously oppressed women of Afghanistan."
>
> These ideological opposites of journalism
> overwhelmingly agree about the key
> players in the Cold War in Afghanistan, and the
> continuing conflict in that
> war-torn country. Isn't it time for the Bush
> administration and their
> pandering propagandists, a/k/a news reporters, in
> the major television and
> news organizations to begin telling the truth to the
> American people???
>
> Tom Turnipseed is an attorney, writer and civil
> rights activist in Columbia,
> South Carolina. http://www.turnipseed.net
>
>
>
===== "The tradition of all the dead generations
weighs like a nightmare on the brain of the living"
-Karl Marx
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send your FREE holiday greetings online! http://greetings.yahoo.com