Why don't millions of people read lbo-talk? Don't say it is because of this that or the other deficiency of lbo-talk, because that could only explain why people _stoppeed_ reading it, not why they never read it to begin with.
Also, "Marxism-Leninism" is shorthand for the ruling theories of the third international in the 1930s, and has nothing necessarily to do with Lenin or even "leninism" -- a phrase that does not, incidentally, necessarily describe the assumptions of those who admire and learn from Lenin. A little nominalism would be appropriate here.
Carrol
Gordon Fitch wrote:
>
> >> "Vanguardism" as
> >> a criticial notion leaves the most objectionable
> >> parts of Leninism out of the critique. Why be
> >> critical of vanguardism and accept far worse aspects
> >> of Leninism
>
> Thomas Seay:
> > Agreed! Once again, I had chosen the wrong
> > term...thanks for making it clearer. You're right...I
> > failed by first labelling it Stalinism, then just
> > vanguardism. The correct word would be to go to the
> > root and call it Leninism.
>
> What elements of Leninism do you see as outside of
> vanguardism, the party _Fuehrerprinzip_ so to speak?
> It seems to me to be the pervasive fault, whether it
> shows up in the Cheka or "state capitalism".
>
> -- Gordon