Chomsky on "theory" from Barsamian interview,was "no social science theories"

Carl Remick carlremick at hotmail.com
Sat Dec 15 14:09:06 PST 2001



>Carl Remick wrote:
>
>>What interests me is that you can find essentially the same view
>>(absent the vitriol and scorn, of course) in Emerson. Emerson was
>>sympathetic to the goals of Charles Fourier, with his often
>>ingenious schemes for utopian socialism, but he thought he was way
>>too rigid and uncomprehending of psychology. It's certainly
>>arguable that the growth and spread of the transcendental awareness
>>that Emerson advocated would produce more socialistic thinking and
>>the development of nonmarket forms of economic coordination, but
>>it's not possible to predict exactly what changes in the structure
>>and operation of society would result.
>
>Yeah, but then Emerson could say cranky things like "Are they my
>poor?" When you traipse through life as a transparent eyeball, you
>sometimes miss the darker side of things.
>
>Doug

Emerson was scarcely oblivious to the darker side. Here's some of what he had to say in his essay "Fate":

"Our America has a bad name for superficialness. Great men, great nations, have not been boasters and buffoons, but perceivers of the terror of life, and have manned themselves to face it. ... Nature is no sentimentalist, -- does not cosset or pamper us. We must see that the world is rough and surly, and will not mind drowning a man or woman, but swallows your ship like a grain of dust. ... The habit of snake and spider, the snap of the tiger and other leapers and bloody jumpers, the crackle of the bones of his prey in the coil of the anaconda, -- these are in the system, and our habits are like theirs."

Emerson certainly thought that no meaningful social revolution could occur without a change in the consciousness of individuals. He was revulsed by the urban poverty he saw in England during an 1847-48 visit -- e.g., "beggary is only the beginning and the sign of sorrow and evil here" -- but he was dubious about the revolutionary ferment he saw in London in 1848: "People here expect a revolution. There will be no revolution, none that deserves to be called so. There may be a scramble for money. But as all the people we see want the things we now have, and not better things, it is very certain that they will, under whatever change of forms, keep the old system. When I see changed men, I shall look for a changed world. Whoever is skilful in heaping money now will be skilful in heaping money again."

Carl

_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list