>>> dhenwood at panix.com 02/07/01 03:15PM >>>
Seth Ackerman wrote:
>But all of these ideas are regional. They don't make much sense as global
>schemes without indulging in the kind of "global civil society" talk one
>hears from Chris Burford.
Why not global proletarian and/or revolutionary society? It doesn't have to be civil, thank god.
For global uncivil society!
Doug
((((((((((
CB: Is there a difference between the goal you are calling for and communism or the world socialist revolution ? Is global proletarianism different than proletarian internationalism ?