> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Yoshie Furuhashi
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2001 8:44 PM
> To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com
> Subject: Re: Tasteless site
>
>
> >Of course, I fully believe the guy has a right to keep the site up.
> >However if tortious action were taken against him, he should lose.
>
> Why should cruelty to animals and its representations be legal
> affairs? To increase jobs for cops, lawyers, forensic psychiatrists,
> etc.?
Now you're arguing a seperate aspect of the law. Should cruelty to animals be illegal? You can meditate on it while you're trying to stuff puss'n'boots into the mason jar.
(obigatory disclaimer: the above was sarcasm and not to be considered stated or implied as recommendation to shove fluffy into any container).