Catherine Driscoll wrote:
>
>
> Sure, like I can't read...
> In what way do you actually disagree with what I'm saying?
> Catherine
But there is nothing to either agree or disagree with in your arguments because they aren't arguments -- they are all about concepts in your head, not social biological relations in the world. Perhaps you actually can't read a materialist argument. That would explain the strange doctrine Doug ascribes to you that questions are ontologically prior to affirmations.
Carrol