Justin Schwartz wrote:
>
Btw, the case leaves untouched the kinds of lawsuits
> for ramps, etc. at public buildings that are the heart of Title II of the
> ADA, at laest if we leave aside that nasty sentence that you quoted.
>
It may still come up if the Supremes decide to take up the Title
II issue pending before the court. I personally think it's pretty
clear from the language of the Rehnquist opinion that they'll
kick out damages under Title II when they get that case (unless
it's a "fundamental rights" kind of case (like voting). It's
also clear they'll keep injunctive relief under Title II.
Marta