Real Despair

Max Sawicky sawicky at epinet.org
Thu Jan 4 06:26:35 PST 2001


CC, quoting Harvy: " . . . The legislation was not, in fact, an outcome of the class and sectional alliance policies which had created the New Deal, but came at the tail-end of a decade in which politics had shifted from universal programs (like social security) to specially targeted programs to help regenerate the inner cities (e.g., the Model Cities and federally funded housing programs), take care of the elderly or the particularly impoverished (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), and target particular disadvantaged groups in the population (Head Start and Affirmative action). . . .

This is off the mark. The launch of the War on Poverty featured a very fragmented, decentralized system of programs aimed at self-help and mobilization of the poor. Nixon's effect was to turn everything into income support (cash and in-kind) which implied a more passive recipient population, not a more fragmented one. The distinction between deserving and undeserving, giving rise to social insurance for the former and means-tested programs for the latter, predates Nixon.

The group phenomenon is associated more properly with the rights-based movements (civil, women, gay, disabled, etc.), towards which Nixon was not particularly solicitous. I'd say the left is more at the root of such fragmentation than Nixon.

mbs



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list