I can and have made a case for why big lumbering banks like Bank of America in its heyday where much better for working class folks (even if tilted inevitably to the wealthy) since it tied the savings and fates of average people into the success of the overall economy. As the days of Savings and Loans and regional banks have given way to junk bonds, "securitization" and venture capital, the money game has become even more starkly an internal circulation of capital among the elite.
Hell, to give a personal example- when I was in Vegas, financing of the casinos had just recently shifted from mob and Teamster pension funds to Milken-financed junk bonds. The result was unquestionably a harsher, anti-worker management.
Do you have any argument for how junk bond financing improved the lives of average folks over the older, conservative banking approach?
Nathan Newman
----- Original Message ----- From: "Doug Henwood" <dhenwood at panix.com> To: "lbo-talk" <lbo-talk at lists.panix.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:53 AM Subject: Free Mike!
Today's Feed daily is my plea to Free Mike Milken! <http://www.feedmag.com/templates/select_template.php3?a_id=1581>. Though they wouldn't let me use those three words as the closing line.
Doug