Peltier question

[Stannard67 at aol.com]

Granted this is not an extremely powerful argument, but I would appreciate it 
if someone more into the case than myself could respond to these arguments 
from the "no parole for peltier" website.

On the issue of illeigal extradition from Canada, the site responds:

"After that material was reviewed, the NPPA wondered about the arguments made 
by the LPDC. The LPDC claimed the FBI fabricated those (three) affidavits 
from a coerced witness. If the FBI did not believe her (and her story that 
obviously got better each time she was interviewed), and if they were 
hell-bent on getting Peltier out of Canada no matter what, why, then, THREE 
(3) affidavits? If that was the case - if the FBI conspiracy was that thick - 
there would have been only ONE affidavit. Is this concept that difficult to 
understand? The LPDC and Peltier supporters constantly yell about conspiracy 
and cover-up. Well, if there was one on the Poor Bear matter, then no one 
would have known about any other affidavits. 

"In a final review of the extradition of Peltier from Canada, Minister of 
Justice, Anne McLellan, in an October 12, 1999 letter to U.S. Attorney 
General, Janet Reno, states, "In short, after reviewing this matter, I have 
concluded that Mr. Peltier was LAWFULLY EXTRADITED to the United States." "

Thanks in advance,
stannard