From: LeoCasey at aol.com
I checked with Maurice Isserman regarding Kelley's inquiry. Here is his response.
-------
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:52:08 -0500 From: Maurice Isserman <misserma at hamilton.edu>
No, Mike never said that. His use of numbers in The Other America were, as Dwight Macdonald noted in his famous New Yorker review, somewhat "impressionistic" -- his estimate of those living below the poverty line was somewhere in the 40 to 60 million range -- quite an elastic definition. Others came up with estimates of about 25 million. Mike was still more of a poet than a social scientist at that point -- that he would probably admit to. His point was that there were a hell of a lot more poor people in America than most well off Americans assumed -- and that was true whether the final statistic stood at 60, 40, or even 25 million.