>that's not what was said. what was said that it wasn't surprising
>that X happened and that's because christianity is sado-masochistic.
>that's making one big grand stereotyping explanatory statment that
>has little evidence to support the assertion.
>
>i call that bigoted thinking. worse, it's bigoted because it
>authorized itself by appeal to a discourse that is supposed to be
>taken seriously because it calls itself scholarship.
So there's no consistency to the various doctrines that have called themselves Christian over the centuries? There are only many plural Christianities?
Doug