<<
Why is tautology metaphorized as a circle? Self-reference as the=20
'gravitational architectonic' of logical 'space', perhaps? Finite and=20
unbounding? It would seem post-identity logics are struggling with=20
self-affine and self-similar dynamics and a suitable rhetoric.=20
English translation please.=20
Leo Casey=20
[snip]
What are we to make of the distinctions between virtuous and viscous =
circles in arguments? -------
>>
Err, "sticky circles" or "vicious circles"?
In this kind of writing, 'viscous" is possible.
-- John K. Taber