>A Rawlsian contractualist, for instance. Sorry if my wording was imprecise.
>Scouring the archives a couple of days ago, I found out that you have
>positivist leanings. Does that mean that you deny the existence of ethics
>because there is no plausible test for verification?
Is this an open question?
living in the vale of ignorance, (like a mushroom) ken "there is no ethical relationship" ...