Rebuilding the Temple and defending the Mosque are hot ticket items in the apocalyptic scripts of both faiths. You need the Temple for the Messiah to come. You need the Mosque (or at least Muslim control of the Mount) for the end times script of Islam to start.
So the Sharon visit was probably calculated to cause the talks to fail by heating up apocalyptic interpretations within Muslim fundamentalism which trumped the moderates.
See:
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/week416/interview.html
http://www.booksense.com/people/archive/gorenbergg.jsp
-Chip Berlet
-----Original Message----- From: owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com [mailto:owner-lbo-talk at lists.panix.com]On Behalf Of Michael Perelman Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 4:11 PM To: lbo-talk at lists.panix.com Subject: Re: Long-term Goals of the Palestinian Authority
Wasn't the one man accompanied by hundreds of troops?
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 01:05:13PM -0700, Brad DeLong wrote:
>
> If there is ever to be peace, lots of unpleasant people will go to
> all kinds of places. Ariel Sharon's feet are bloody, yes. But how is
> it that a visit of one man to one historical/religious site can
> destroy negotiations "in process"--if those negotiations are real?
>
>
> Brad DeLong
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu