Cheers, Ken Hanly
I agree with P that in general, a strong intuition trumps an apparantly strong argument for a counterinituitive conclusion. It's a pragmatist platitude taht one man's modus ponens is another man's modus tollens, that if an argument has an unpalatable conclusion, we might do well to reassess the truth of the premises and test the validity of the reasoning. This is also Rawls' view. It is the basic idea that the notion of reflective equilibrium i supposed to capture.
--jks
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20010721/5b2b4b4b/attachment.htm>