If your going to attack me as a bigot, that project is going to entail a debunking of my "prejudices." Deriding me as an insensitive, prejudiced jerk who cannot be reasoned with seems to me to be an overreach on your part.
-- Luke
Jim wrote:
> Usually when people have prejudices that are held by a lot (majority?) of
> people they are better able to articulate a sophisticated justification
for
> their ugly beliefs. Luke you did not even bother making a coherent
attempt
> at prejudice (although you at least tried to justify your prejudice by
> saying that it would be OK to be prejudiced toward you).
>
> Let me just say I disagree 100% (with your prejudices against disability,
> cognitive ability, and physical symmetry). Your conflation of
> intelligence, attractiveness and disability is absolutely abhorrent. I
> also think your lack of respect for passionately held beliefs and the work
> of several people on this list (life's work in Marta's and Chuck's cases)
> makes any discussion impossible.
>
> Jim