>I'm kinda surprised nobody's brought up Wittgenstein here. His later
>stuff is (for me) a slam-dunk refutation of ken's common-sense "I have
>privileged access to my own experiences" spiel.
>
>Miles
Dear god! Am I insane? What am I thinking right now? If you can't answer this question accurately then I'm right and all the nay-sayers are wrong. End of story.
Bunch of Jungians I swear!
collective, what? ken-doll
PS. Wittgenstein is one of Habermas's biggest influences, he develops this framework out of Wittgenstein's thought (among others). See On the Logic of the Social Sciences, 1970, trans. 1988.